Thaksin Faces Ethics Breach Accusations

Table of Contents
Thaksin Faces Ethics Breach Accusations

Calls for Investigation into Finance Minister's Involvement with Thaksin Shinawatra

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) is facing growing pressure to investigate Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira after he invited former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra to a high-level meeting discussing U.S. tariffs on Thai goods. This development has sparked concerns among political activists and critics about potential ethical violations and the influence of non-official figures in government affairs.

Political activist Ruangkrai Leekitwattana submitted a formal letter to the NACC on Saturday, requesting an inquiry into Pichai’s actions. The letter was prompted by Pichai’s admission that he had invited Thaksin to a policy advisory meeting held at the Government House residence in Ban Phitsanulok. Ruangkrai raised questions about whether this invitation breached the ethical standards expected of government officials, particularly since Thaksin does not hold any official position within the government.

Critics argue that Thaksin’s involvement may represent interference in governmental processes, especially given his history as a former prime minister and business tycoon. Pichai defended the decision, stating that Thaksin was invited due to his extensive experience and expertise in economic matters. The meeting was convened to address Thailand’s response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal of a 36% tariff on imported Thai goods, which is set to take effect in August.

In his letter, Ruangkrai outlined several key points, referencing the code of ethics for high-ranking officials and past Supreme Court rulings on ethical violations. He emphasized that Pichai’s admission alone warrants scrutiny from the NACC. According to the law, judges, heads of independent agencies, and senior officials are required to act with honesty and integrity, avoid conflicts of interest, uphold the rule of law, maintain confidentiality, and respect differing opinions during meetings.

Ruangkrai argued that inviting Thaksin—someone without a formal role in the government—into official discussions could violate multiple ethical provisions. These include issues related to bad faith, conflicts of interest, and the reputation of the ministerial office. He also warned that such actions could damage the image and dignity of Pichai’s role as a minister, potentially eroding public trust in the cabinet.

At a recent "55 Years of Nation" forum, Thaksin hinted at his influence over government policy, further fueling concerns. Ruangkrai urged the NACC to consider video footage from the event as supporting evidence. He expressed fears that allowing such conduct to go unchecked might set a dangerous precedent, encouraging other cabinet members to invite external individuals to sensitive discussions without legal justification.

On the other hand, former Pheu Thai Party spokesman Prompong Nopparit defended Thaksin’s presence at the meeting. He pointed out that the gathering included economic ministers, former cabinet members, and the prime minister’s policy advisory team. Prompong argued that Thaksin, as a two-time former prime minister, provided valuable insights into Thailand’s trade challenges, particularly the looming 36% U.S. tariff. He emphasized that early discussions were necessary to explore solutions and initiate possible negotiations with Washington.

This controversy highlights the ongoing debate about the boundaries of influence in Thai politics and the need for transparency and accountability in government decisions. As the situation unfolds, the NACC’s response will be closely watched by both supporters and critics of the current administration.

Posting Komentar